Jerry Sickles -from the New Jersey chapter of the National institute of Directors (USA), Fellow of the Governance and Sustainability Institute, and co-author of Strategic Governance- calls for a thorough global re-evaluation of the nuclear industry based on the seven questions from the Strategic Governance System designed to assess any industry’s sustainability.
Here they are (in parenthesis my doubts on the method and process):
1. Is the vision for the industry pure and beneficial to the global community? (this is a very difficult issue..pure and beneficial in what sense?)
2. Is the industry’s purpose well-intended? (well intended in what sense and how does it differ from the previous point?)
3. Do industry leaders seek and speak the truth? (the truth does not exist..there are at least as many truths as there are interest groups)
4. Do industry leaders “walk the talk” – not merely say what they do, but actually do what they say? (this is the definition, in my view, of the term trust)
5. Is the industry environmentally and socially justifiable, not associated with the production of useless, harmful, or evil goods and services? (who decides the levels of justification?)
6. Does the industry keep in mind its members’ true nature and how they contribute to the success of our global eco-system? (if by members the implication is industry members, why is there absolutely no reference to the industry’s other stakeholders?)
7. Does the industry integrate governance, strategy, risk, culture, and sustainability? (ok)
Your take on this issue?